1st March 2009

Economics 101

A couple days ago, I was at work and talking to a couple of my coworkers about the stimulus package. Its amazing how little people understand about simple economics. Its depressing as hell.

All everyone is worried about is getting a check from on high. Not a single person understands where the money is coming from. When I pointed out that the money is being borrowed and will have to be paid back by our children and their children, they either don’t believe it, or even worse don’t care.

What has happened to education in this country? I know everything I have learned about economics has not come from my public education. I had to learn it on my own, and use logic to think things through. Not a single bit of it comes from school. Hell, most people don’t even understand that government spending and raising taxes will make the recession worse, not help it.

I firmly believe that this is not an accident. An ignorant public is exactly what our government wants. This way they can tell you whatever they want and the public, not knowing better, just believes. Joe Public believes that Obama and Nancy Pelosi have their best interests at heart. When in reality, they dont care a bit. All they want is to further their own schemes and socialistic morals.

“Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem” – Ronald Reagan

There’s a song “Where have all the Cowboys Gone.”  My question is “Where have all the conservatives gone?” Why can’t we get a real conservative to run for President? McCain is a RINO. Dubya wasn’t really a conservative either.

Really, tho, this isn’t the fault of the Republican Party so much as the fault of the voters:

“In a democracy, people get the government they deserve.”

And considering what I’ve seen, we deserve it.

-Merlyworm

Add to Yahoo Add to Google Furl this Add to Spurl Save to Del.icio.us Digg IT! Live Bookmarks! Blogmarks
Sphere: Related Content

posted in American Economy, American Politics, Merlyworm, education | 0 Comments

1st March 2009

Hey how about a fresh cup of STFU!

Cup of STFU Ok, I was fine when you took away the styrofoam McD’s containers. I was fine when you mandated we needed to drive cleaner burning vehicles. Sure, I don’t even mind that much bagging my leaves instead of burning them.

However now you’re going to damn far! This is just simply just wrong.

The tenderness of the delicate American buttock is causing more environmental devastation than the country’s love of gas-guzzling cars, fast food or McMansions, according to green campaigners. At fault, they say, is the US public’s insistence on extra-soft, quilted and multi-ply products when they use the bathroom.

Now alot of people around the world have accused us Americans of a lot of bad things. We’re arrogant, warmongers, rude, uneducated, blah blah but now  I think they are starting to run out of things..now they are complaining that we have tender buttocks?!  Also it’s worse then all the other things you already took away? I don’t know about anyone else but the last thing anyone wants is some soccer mom driving around her hummer chowing down on big macs while she has chaffed buttocks! Does Al Gore know about this? Quick someone get Big Al on the phone and let’s get a documentary going on the importance of using sandpaper toilet paper. Perhaps Barney Frank can head up a committee on the “tenderness of the American Buttock and how it lags behind the world in anal toughness”.  I’m quite certain that’s a subject that Senator Frank will get be happy to support.

You know, I wondered what the press would do if they couldn’t blame everything on Bush, little did I know that they would aim such a low blow! For all those more worried about what type of toilet paper we Americans use then the worlds decline into global depression I give you this cup of STFU.

Add to Yahoo Add to Google Furl this Add to Spurl Save to Del.icio.us Digg IT! Live Bookmarks! Blogmarks
Sphere: Related Content

posted in Cup of STFU | 0 Comments

28th February 2009

Do you feel lucky punk? Well do you?

So, hope and change has hit America. President Obama is bringing hope and change to whatever he can. First he crammed the stimulus bill down our throats. Sure for a minute it looked like it wasn’t going to make it but then 3 Republican (in name only) Senators blinked. Even then it looked like public opinion was working against it but a series of high profile speeches and tv appearances turned the tide and now our kids and grand kids will have to pay for it.

So the first part of the plan to change America is underway, the bankrupting of our future, but wait too many people might notice! What’s a good socialist to do then when faced with, what might be a generation of people staunchly against his plans. Well how about taking away their access to health care? Wait, what’s that you say? President Obama promised universal health care to all! We’d get benefits from an economy to scale, force hospitals and health care systems to service everyone. He promised us all that we’d have a system like Canada or one of those countries where everyone is covered! Snicker..well what he DIDN’T promise is that there would be a hospital for everyone.

Now Logan don’t be crazy, there’s lots of hospitals! What’s the President going to do that could risk hospital closings? So glad you asked! What he can do, is challenge the Catholic Church to a game of gigantic chicken over one of the holy grails of the democratic party. Abortion. Now before anyone gets twisted, I couldn’t give a rats anus over the abortion issue. You want to get scraped, get scraped. You don’t want to, then don’t.  If there’s a God you can deal with Her over it. If there is no God, then well no life regardless of when it happens is sacred. I tend to stay out of abortion debates except for the caveat that some more consideration needs to be given to a mans rights in it (another post, another time, another jack and coke perhaps)
However, when the fight over abortion is something that might affect MY access to health care, now I gotta pay attention. So let’s look at what’s going on shall we?  The AP posted this article tonight, here’s an excerpt.

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama plans to repeal a Bush administration rule that has become a flash point in the debate over a doctor’s right not to participate in abortions. The regulation, instituted in the last days of the Bush administration, strengthened job protections for doctors and nurses who refuse to provide a medical service because of moral qualms.

A Health and Human Services official said Friday the administration will publish notice of its intentions early next week, opening a 30-day comment period for advocates on both sides, medical groups and the public

Wonder why that was released on a Friday night? Could it be that Friday night is the news graveyard and no one will notice it?  Nah, this is the most transparent government ever, President Obama says so. Of course, with any move by the government, some are happy with it, some are not. So the White House issued a release clarifying it all for us.

But the Obama administration was concerned that the Bush regulation went too far and could also be used to refuse birth control, family planning services and counseling for vaccines and transfusions.
The White House released a statement saying that Obama supports a “carefully crafted” conscience clause — not Bush’s version.
“He believes this issue requires a balance between the rights of providers and the health of women and their families, a balance that the last-minute Bush rule appears to upset,” the statement said.

There, all straight? Like any snake oil salesman they are trying to make their product sound good to everyone.

Now what’s this got to do with hospitals closing? Elementary my Dear Watson!  You see so much of what any government does is to try and balance itself on slippery slopes. This one is no exception. Where the rewriting of these rules slips into even more dangerous ground is what’s called the FOCA. Freedom of Choice Act, boy oh boy that sounds like a swell thing. We all should have the freedom of choices. See here’s the problem, if it forces doctors or health institutions morally opposed to performing abortions into doing them it’ll cause a showdown between the Catholic Church and the administration. Basically detractors of FOCA says it’s gives freedom of choice to everyone BUT doctors but people who support the plan say that those objectors are covered by current conscience laws.

So if President Obama rewrites those guidelines, then passes and signs FOCA (he’s gone on record as saying he’ll sign it, look it up) then what’s a doctor or health organization who is morally against abortion to do? Since our President is from Chicago, lets check in with the Auxillary Bishop of Chicago, Thomas Paprocki who says:

Auxiliary Bishop Thomas Paprocki of Chicago spoke up about the threats to Catholic health care under the bill.

“It could mean discontinuing obstetrics in our hospitals, and we may need to consider taking the drastic step of closing our Catholic hospitals entirely,” Paprocki said. “It would not be sufficient to withdraw our sponsorship or to sell them to someone who would perform abortions. That would be a morally unacceptable cooperation in evil.”

“I do not think I’m being alarmist in considering such drastic steps,” he said. “We need to respond in a morally appropriate, responsible fashion.”

Hmm, ok so a few catholic hospitals shut down, don’t be such a chicken little Logan! Well, what do YOU consider a few hospitals? What if I told you that the Catholic church runs the 3rd LARGEST health care organization in America?

Catholic Health Care9

  • Hospitals: 557 Catholic hospitals treated 83,795,186 patients
  • Other Health Care Centers: 417 centers treated 7,271,716 patients
  • Specialized Homes: 1,538 assisted 756,902 residents
  • Residential Care of Children: 163 locations assisted 30,106 residents

And now you see where I was going with there being a lack of hospitals as the cost of this game of chicken! 557 hospitals (roughly 1 hospital for every one of Bidens gaffes in the last 9 months) could close. This wouldn’t be a situation where they close some hospitals and leave others open. It would be a Papal decision, give in or take a stand. If push comes to shove, who do you think would blink first?

Add to Yahoo Add to Google Furl this Add to Spurl Save to Del.icio.us Digg IT! Live Bookmarks! Blogmarks
Sphere: Related Content

posted in American Politics, Roman catholic church, abortion | 0 Comments

27th February 2009

File this under the…

No shit sherlock section.  Seems many people in America are reading the news, seeing what’s going on with the unFairness Doctrine, the massive generational debt er stimulus package, and all the talk of making everyone poor Equality among the masses, that it’s causing people to flock to read or re-read Atlas Shrugged. Even though I haven’t posted much in the last year, I’ve pointed out repeatedly through out this blog that Ayn Rand was prophetic in that book as it relates to the way our country is going.

Now I’ll admit I’m rusty on posting and writing but it hasn’t meant that I haven’t been paying attention to what’s going on. Rather I think it was because there was SO much I wanted to talk about, write about, scream about that I couldn’t find the time in the day to get it all out. Instead of writers block, I had writers traffic jam.  Well recently, some wrecks have been towed to the side of the road (good bye John McCains feeble attempt at a campaign), some slow moving cars have sped up (hello Republicans starting to rediscover fiscal conservatism), and now maybe I can or will start writing more.

There will be more writing to come in the days ahead. Some of it will be witty, some will suck, some of it you’ll agree with and some of it will make you think “I’d never say that outloud”. All I can say is that I’m going to try and keep the traffic moving. I’ll leave the 3 readers I have left with this quote from Ayn Rand. Remember is as you listen to our President (and yes he is OUR president) talk about wealth in America.

“If a man proposes to redistribute wealth, he means explicitly and necessarily the wealth is his to distribute. If he proposed it in the name of the government, then the wealth belongs to the government; if in the name of society, then it belongs to society. No one, to my knowledge, did or could define a difference between that proposal and the basic principle of communism.”

—Ayn Rand, “The Dead End,”

Add to Yahoo Add to Google Furl this Add to Spurl Save to Del.icio.us Digg IT! Live Bookmarks! Blogmarks
Sphere: Related Content

posted in American Politics | 1 Comment

26th February 2009

Wowa.

It does appear that we havent posted in almost a year. I believe this will change, what with my prediction of Obama winning the Presidency.

Ayn Rand would be so very proud of her Nostradamus like predictions.

Anyways, I will begin posting again a couple times a week. I hope Logan can do the same.

-Merlyworm

Add to Yahoo Add to Google Furl this Add to Spurl Save to Del.icio.us Digg IT! Live Bookmarks! Blogmarks
Sphere: Related Content

posted in American Politics | 1 Comment

  • Topics of discussions

Coalition Against Illegal Immigration


Supporting Members

  • Bookmarks

    • Add to Yahoo
    • Add to Google
    • Furl this
    • Add to Spurl
    • Save to Del.icio.us
    • Digg IT!
    • Live Bookmarks!
    • Blogmarks
  • Subscriptions

    • Add to Yahoo
    • Add to Google
    • Subscribe in Rojo
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add your feed to Newsburst from CNET News.com
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Add to My MSN